This page is not a forum for general discussion about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk.
Rugrats was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– There is a 2021 TV series called "Rugrats" (which already has a page), so the new primary topic appears to be the franchise and not the 1991 TV show 134.199.113.124 (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, OP presents no evidence to support his/her case. The original series appears to be the primary topic, both by pageviews and long-term notability. 162 etc. (talk) 01:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated, but you know you can just use "their" instead of "his/her" when you don't know someone's gender, btw. It's not ungrammatical at all; English has been using the singular 'they' since the 1300s in sentences like "Someone left their umbrella. I'll try to find them but I don't know where they went." Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st oppose 2nd, move the DAB to the base name as no primary topic given the generic use. The 1991 one has 31,802 views, the 2021 one has 17,814, the film series has 1,220, the franchise has 764, the comic strip has 130, the band has 17 and Toddler has 14,114. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The original show is still the apex of the franchise, so there'd be no real point in a move unless the reboot lasts for years and years (not very likely). And anyway, as of right now, Rugrats (franchise) is mostly just a list of content already described at Rugrats#Franchise, so it's not like swapping the pages around would really improve things. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
